Dimensionless physical constant Totally Explained

Everything about Fundamental Physical Constants totally explained

In physics, dimensionless or fundamental physical constants are, in the strictest sense, universal physical constants that are independent of systems of units and hence are dimensionless quantities. However, the term may also refer (as in NIST

) to any dimensional universal physical constant, such as the speed of light, vacuum permittivity, and the gravitational constant.

Introduction

While both mathematical constants and fundamental physical constants are dimensionless, the latter are determined only by physical measurement and are not defined by any combination of pure mathematical constants.
Physicists try to make their theories simpler and more elegant by reducing the number of physical constants appearing in the mathematical expression of physical theory. They do this by defining the units of measurement in such a way that a number of common physical constants, such as the speed of light, are normalized to unity. The resulting system of units, known as natural units, has a fair following in the literature on advanced physics because it considerably simplifies many equations. When physical quantities are measured in terms of natural units, those quantities become dimensionless.
Certain physical constants, however, are dimensionless numbers which can't be eliminated in this way. Hence their values must be ascertained experimentally. Perhaps the best known example is the fine structure constant:
ť

alpha = frac

where

e

is the elementary charge,

hbar

is the reduced Planck's constant,

c

is the speed of light in a vacuum, and

epsilon_0

is the permittivity of free space. In simple terms, the fine structure constant determines how strong the electromagnetic force is. There is no accepted theory of why

alpha

has the value it does. The analog of the fine structure constant for gravitation is the gravitational coupling constant.
A long-sought goal of theoretical physics is to find first principles from which some or all of the dimensionless constants can be calculated instead of being empirically estimated. The reduction of chemistry to physics was an enormous step in this direction, since properties of atoms and molecules can now be calculated from the Standard Model, at least in principle. The list of fundamental physical constants increases when experiments measure new relationships between physical phenomena. The list decreases when physical theory advances and shows how some previously fundamental constant can be computed in terms of others. A successful Grand Unified Theory or Theory of Everything might yield a further reduction in the number of fundamental constants, ideally to zero. However, this goal remains elusive.

The Standard Model

According to Michio Kaku (1994: 124-27), the Standard Model of particle physics contains nineteen arbitrary dimensionless constants that describe the masses of the particles and the strengths of the various interactions. This was before it was discovered that neutrinos can have nonzero mass, and his list includes a quantity called the theta angle which seems to be zero. After the discovery of neutrino mass, and leaving out the theta angle, John Baez

(2002) noted that the new Standard Model requires twenty-five arbitrary fundamental constants, namely the:

Fine structure constant;
Strong coupling constant;
Masses of the fundamental particles (represented in terms of the Planck mass or some other natural unit of mass), namely the six quarks, the six leptons, the Higgs boson, the W boson and the Z boson;
Four parameters of the CKM matrix, which describe how quarks oscillate between different forms;
Four parameters of the Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata matrix, which does the same thing for neutrinos.

Gravity requires one more fundamental constant, namely the:

cosmological constant (represented in terms of Planck units) of Einstein's equations for general relativity. This makes for a current total of 26 dimensionless fundamental physical constants. More constants presumably await discovery, to describe the properties of dark matter. If the description of dark energy turns out to be more complicated than can be modelled by the cosmological constant, yet more constants will be needed.

Martin Rees's 6 Numbers

In his book Just Six Numbers, Martin Rees mulls over the following six numbers, which he considers fundamental to present-day physical theory:

ν, Nu: a dimensionless number, ≈10⁴³, that's the ratio of the fine structure constant to the gravitational coupling constant defined using two electrons. These constants are the respective coupling constants for the electroweak force and gravitation;

ε, Epsilon: related to the strong force;

ω, Omega: the number of electrons and protons in the observable universe (circa 10⁸⁰);

λ, Lambda: the cosmological constant;

Q: a ratio of fundamental energies;

δ, Delta: the number of spatial dimensions. Since Delta must be a nonzero natural number and can't be measured, most physicists wouldn't deem it a dimensionless physical constant of the sort discussed in this entry. (Why it's apparently 3, and why it can't be a rational number are not addressed here.) The entry spacetime discusses a number of physical and mathematical reasons why Delta = 3.
These six constants constrain any plausible fundamental physical theory, which must either derive their values from the mathematics of the theory, or accept them as empirical and arbitrary. The question then arises: how many values of these constants result from purely mathematical considerations, and how many represent degrees of freedom for possible valid physical theories, only some of which are possible in a universe, such as ours, with intelligent observers? This leads to a number of interesting possibilities, including the possibility of multiple universes, each with different values of these constants. Multiple universes give rise to selection effects and the anthropic principle.

Other

Barrow and Tipler (1986) anchors its broad-ranging discussion of astrophysics, cosmology, quantum physics, teleology, and the anthropic principle in the fine structure constant, the proton-electron mass ratio, and the coupling constants for the strong force and gravitation.
The mathematician Simon Plouffe has made an extensive search of computer databases of mathematical formulae, seeking formulae giving the mass ratios of the fundamental particles.
The study of the fundamental constants sometimes has bordered on numerology. For instance, the astrophysicist Arthur Eddington set out alleged mathematical reasons why the fine structure constant had to be exactly 1/136. When its value was discovered to be closer to 1/137, he changed his argument to match that value. Experiments have since shown that Eddington was wrong; the constant, to six significant digits, is 1/137.036 .

Further Information

Get more info on 'Fundamental Physical Constants'.

External Link Exchanges

Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:

<a href="http://dimensionless_physical_constant.totallyexplained.com">Dimensionless physical constant Totally Explained</a>

Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned.